How we work
A structured review before further commitment.
We review the information available about your project and document our findings in a readiness report. Where further work is appropriate, a separately commissioned Whitepaper defines the proposed path to tokenomics.
Working sequence
- 01
Share your context
Tell us about the project and the decision you need to make.
- 02
Agree the scope
Confirm the review’s outputs, required materials and commercial terms.
- 03
Receive the review
Get a written account of findings, assumptions, gaps and recommended next steps.
- 04
Decide what comes next
Use the recommendation to decide whether to progress, address conditions, pause or stop.
Decision Gateway
Decision Gateway
Our readiness work distinguishes the materials received, the assumptions relied upon, unresolved issues and the further work required. Where the engagement includes a Decision Gateway, the recommendation may be Go, Proceed with Conditions, Pause or No-Go.
Further work is separately scoped. The assessment does not commit the client to an implementation programme.
Possible recommendations
Go
Move to defining the scope of the next engagement, which may include a separately commissioned Whitepaper.
Proceed with Conditions
Address the stated conditions before progressing as specified.
Pause
Defer while further information, decisions or reviews are required.
No-Go
Stop tokenization planning at this stage because of the identified constraints.
A Go recommendation is not approval of an asset or confirmation that issuance, financing or a market will be available.
What Phase One means in our pilot engagements.
The Phase One Pilot Readiness Assessment is a preliminary review based on materials provided by the client. It covers readiness gaps and potential pathways that may merit further analysis.
It concludes with a Phase One Readiness Report and a Decision Gateway discussion. The Decision Gate Memo records the recommendation and is confirmed by signature or email.
The work does not include independent verification, an audit, a valuation, specialist legal or tax advice, a full investor-demand study or technical implementation unless separately agreed under the appropriate engagement.
The client’s materials are part of the scope.
The client remains responsible for supplying the relevant records and assumptions. Where material is missing or unsuitable for reliance, the report may identify the area as unresolved or not assessable.
How tokenization works
From asset to token. Where readiness fits.
A token represents defined rights. Before it can be issued, the project needs a clear basis for those rights, supporting information and an agreed structure.
An illustrative sequence, not a commitment to deliver every phase. Legal, regulatory and partner questions are considered throughout; steps may overlap or stop.
Project context
The asset
Start with the asset or project: a building, a farm, a portfolio or a business activity. Identify who owns it, the rights involved and the information available about its economics.
Phase 1 · Project context
The asset
Start with the asset or project: a building, a farm, a portfolio or a business activity. Identify who owns it, the rights involved and the information available about its economics.
Phase 1 · Earthberries · Phase One
Readiness
Earthberries reviews client-provided materials: ownership records, financial assumptions, existing commitments and decision-making responsibilities. Phase One identifies gaps and ends with a report and a recommendation: Go, Proceed with Conditions, Pause or No-Go.
A preliminary review, without independent verification unless separately agreed. Go means defining the next engagement, not approval to issue.
Phase 2 · Specialist work
Structure
The proposed legal arrangements define what a holder would own or be entitled to. Depending on the project, this may involve a separate legal vehicle. Qualified advisers address the legal, tax and valuation questions within their engagements.
Phase 2 · Earthberries · Separate engagement
The Whitepaper
Under a separately scoped Phase Two engagement, Earthberries documents the proposed token design: rights, supply, transfer rules, governance and project dependencies. Specialist input informs the document.
The Whitepaper is a deliverable of a subsequent engagement. Producing it does not launch a token or secure regulatory approval.
Phase 2 · Advisers and relevant intermediaries
Compliance and partners
The project identifies the applicable requirements and who is responsible for meeting them. Activities requiring authorisation are carried out by appropriately licensed intermediaries. Onboarding, distribution and custody arrangements depend on the project and jurisdiction.
These questions inform readiness and structuring; they are not a final check left until issuance.
Phase 3 · Subject to requirements and separate implementation
Issuance
If the required arrangements, reviews and decisions are in place, the rights defined in the documents may be represented by tokens. The technology must reflect the agreed structure and transfer restrictions.
Tokenization does not, by itself, establish ownership or replace the governing documents.
Phase 4 · Ongoing operation
Cash flows and reporting
Where the asset generates income, payments are handled according to the governing documents. The operating arrangements define administration, reporting and the responsibilities of each party.
Phase 4 · Conditional on the structure and market
Transfers
Where the structure and applicable rules permit, interests may be transferred between eligible holders. Restrictions, available counterparties and market arrangements determine whether a transfer can take place.
A token does not guarantee that a buyer or a secondary market will be available.
We start with readiness: a written view of the information available, the gaps and the next decision.
The assessment covers Phase One. Any Whitepaper or further work needs a separate scope and engagement.
Beyond the assessment · A separate engagement
A Whitepaper for your path to tokenomics.
For projects moving beyond the initial review, Earthberries prepares a Whitepaper under a separate engagement. It sets out the project’s proposed path to tokenomics.
A document for your team and advisers to discuss the proposed approach and the work needed to develop it.
Your questions, answered.
Does a positive screening result mean the asset is ready to issue?
No. Screening is based on the information submitted and is an initial step. Further review, specialist input and the relevant decisions may still be required.
Does Earthberries independently verify the client’s documents?
The pilot readiness scope described on this page relies on client-provided materials without independent verification unless expressly agreed in writing. The scope of any new engagement must specify its own review boundaries.
Will the assessment tell us how much capital we can raise?
It does not guarantee capital availability or establish investor demand. The review may identify assumptions and further work needed to evaluate a potential pathway.
Do we need to have selected a blockchain or technical provider?
You can discuss your project before making those selections. The relevant technical and partner questions depend on the proposed structure and agreed scope.
Can our existing advisers participate?
The roles of existing advisers and any additional specialists can be defined when scoping the engagement.
What happens after a Pause or No-Go?
The recommendation explains the conditions or constraints identified. Further work is not automatically required or sold as a consequence of that outcome.
A first conversation
Start with the decision you need to make.
Tell us about the asset, your role and the question you want to resolve.
Discuss your project